BREAKING: Multiple Sources say the U.S. Ambassador to Canada is Actively "In The Loop" With Trump-aligned/Funded Separatists In Alberta

Inside Pete Hoekstra’s Role in the Alberta Separatist Play To Turn Alberta (And Their Oil) Into the 51st State

There is a lie being told to Canadians — not loudly, not recklessly, but carefully and with intent.

The lie is that the Alberta separatist movement’s sudden access to Washington is a coincidence. That it emerged organically. That it is the product of fringe actors freelancing without institutional awareness inside the Trump regime.

According to multiple sources with direct knowledge of ongoing coordination efforts, that is not true.

The reality is far more dangerous.

Sources say Pete Hoekstra is not merely aware of pro-Trump Alberta separatist activity — he is actively involved in coordinating it at arm’s length, through intermediaries tied to other members of the Trump political apparatus. Not as a rogue. Not as a bystander. As a participant operating behind diplomatic cover.

Shocker, huh…

“The kind of US Money and US 'boots on the ground’ ravaging Alberta doesn’t happen without Pete Hoesktra’s total buy-in, knowledge, and influence.”

- Source

The architecture described by sources is deliberate and familiar to anyone who has studied modern influence operations. Hoekstra does not meet directly with separatist principals. He does not leave fingerprints. He does not appear on calendars or visitor logs. Instead, communication flows through a lattice of Trump-aligned officials, former administration figures, legal cutouts, financial intermediaries, and Canadian political and media actors cloaked in the language of “provincial autonomy” and “economic independence.”

Plausible deniability is not an accident here. It is the point.

The objective, according to multiple accounts, is to weaken Canadian federal authority by legitimizing separatist actors as Washington-recognized stakeholders — quietly, incrementally, and without ever issuing a formal endorsement that would trigger an immediate diplomatic rupture.

This is how sovereign states are destabilized without firing a shot.

Public reporting already confirms that U.S. officials held multiple meetings in Washington with leaders and legal representatives tied to Alberta’s separatist movement, including discussions involving hypothetical financing structures of extraordinary scale and follow-on engagement at the Treasury level. Those meetings were framed publicly as exploratory.

Sources say they were preparatory.

More importantly, sources say Hoekstra’s office was not outside that process. It was informed. It was aligned. And it played a role in shaping access, sequencing, and tone — even as Hoekstra publicly maintained the posture of a conventional ambassador while working with US/Russian-funded far-right fake Canadian media outlets, aligned with Temu Trump, Pierre Poilievre.

In fact, my source has said that Hoekstra is ‘in contact with the Maple MAGA party much more than we originally thought,” and that contact ‘extends to US proxies working with Alberta hillbilly separatist leaders like Jeffrey Rath, who is so stupid (MAGA Stupidity is borderless) he basically admitted as much last week:

Under international law, a diplomat accredited to a host country is prohibited from facilitating political movements aimed at fragmenting that country’s sovereignty. Doing so is incompatible with diplomatic function. It crosses the line from representation into subversion.

Canada is not required to prove espionage to act. It only needs to determine whether the ambassador has abused his position.

And that determination is now underway, and has been for some time.

None of this should surprise anyone who followed Hoekstra’s tenure as U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands. There, he was publicly caught fabricating claims about “no-go zones,” exaggerating civil disorder, and then dismissing his own statements as “fake news” when confronted on camera. He did not misstate facts accidentally. He advanced a narrative, denied it when challenged, and retreated only when exposure became unavoidable

The pattern is consistent.

First, delegitimize the host country.
Then, align with far-right grievance narratives.
Then, deny involvement when scrutiny arrives.

In Canada, the narrative phase was never subtle.

Hoekstra repeatedly described Canada as “mean and nasty” to deal with. He accused the Canadian government of meddling in U.S. elections for running anti-tariff ads. He publicly suggested Canadians should accept punitive tariffs as a cost of proximity to American power. He told audiences he was disappointed to be posted here at all.

According to sources, the goal was to normalize contempt for Canadian sovereignty while signaling alignment with Trump’s coercive trade posture — creating rhetorical cover for U.S. engagement with separatist actors seeking to fracture the federation from within.

In other words, soften the ground before the breach.

Canada’s response so far has been measured to the point of restraint. But that restraint is nearing its limit.

Senior officials are now weighing a range of options, including a formal diplomatic demarche, a public assertion of boundaries, and — most significantly — declaring Hoekstra persona non grata and forcing his recall. Under the Vienna Convention, Canada has the absolute right to do so, without explanation, if a diplomat’s conduct is deemed incompatible with their role.

Sources say what has delayed action is not uncertainty. It is timing.

Once the documentary record is made public—once communications, intermediaries, and coordination pathways are laid out—there will be no ambiguity left to manage. There will be no plausible deniability to preserve. And there will be no way to pretend this was a misunderstanding.

This reporting is based on multiple independent sources with direct knowledge of coordination activity between Trump-aligned operatives and Canadian political actors. Corroborating documentation is forthcoming. Some of it, sources say, will make continued diplomatic silence impossible.

When that happens, the question will not be whether Pete Hoekstra crossed the line.

The question will be why Canada tolerated it for as long as it did.

A sovereign country does not allow a foreign ambassador to behave like a political handler.

And Canada is now being forced to choose whether it intends to act like one.

I’d suggest it’s high f****** time to do so.