The Quiet Breakaway: How US Governors In 12 States Are Practicing Coordinated “Soft Secession” From Trump's America— Legally

Governors, attorneys general, and mayors are quietly building a democratic firewall — one policy shield at a time. And it has a name: "Soft Secession"

Soft Secession: A Pro-Democracy Field Guide

TL;DR: “Soft secession” is the states’ constitutional, non-violent refusal to be commandeered by a president who wants to federalize local police, state services, and everything in between. It’s not breaking the Union; it’s using the Union’s own rules — anti-commandeering, state budgets, compacts, and relentless litigation — to protect the voters who actually elected these governments.

At 7:59 a.m. ET, a dozen state legal teams hover over a shared doc: draft complaint, exhibits ready, TRO language tight. At 8:00 a.m., the huddle begins. The question is always the same: How do we govern for our residents, without asking permission from a president testing the boundaries of authoritarian control? By 9:30, the filings are out, the press lines are set, and state troopers still report to their governors, not to the federal government in Washington. That’s soft secession in practice.

What “Soft Secession” Means (and Doesn’t)

• What it is: A lawful, targeted non-cooperation strategy. States decline to carry out or resource federal initiatives they judge unlawful or harmful. They write their own playbooks on policing priorities, health care, data privacy, procurement, and the National Guard — and they defend those choices in court.

• What it isn’t: Not secession. Not nullification. Not theatrics. It’s federalism doing its job: preventing one man from running fifty states by decree.

The legal backbone: The anti-commandeering doctrine and classic checks on coercive funding. In normal-person terms: Washington can make federal rules, but it can’t force states to enforce them or rewire state budgets to do its bidding.

The Trigger: A Push to Federalize Policing and Public Order

When a president publicly flirts with using emergency powers to seize control of local policing, deploys federal forces over state objections, or threatens to cut vital funds unless states comply, governors don’t debate theory — they move. The response is immediate and layered: limit cooperation, pass shield laws, assemble coalitions, and sue fast.

The Governors’ Firewall (Who’s in the room)

You can spot the pattern across Illinois, California, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Colorado, New Jersey, Maryland, Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon and more:

• Governors J.B. Pritzker (IL), Gavin Newsom (CA), Gretchen Whitmer (MI), Kathy Hochul (NY), Josh Shapiro (PA), Maura Healey (MA), Tim Walz (MN), Jared Polis (CO), Phil Murphy (NJ), Wes Moore (MD), Katie Hobbs (AZ), Michelle Lujan Grisham (NM), Tina Kotek (OR) — among others — have publicly framed their job as protecting residents from political federal overreach while keeping streets safe.

• They’ve already built muscle memory in multistate compacts (reproductive freedom, climate, data privacy), coordinated procurement, and joint standards. That architecture now doubles as a democracy-protection network.

The 8 A.M. Legal Huddle (Narrative)

Picture the scene: senior counsels from CA, IL, MI, NY, MA, MN, CO, NJ, AZ, MD on an encrypted call. Docket check. Venue strategy. Amicus assignments. Budget memos teed up for legislatures. The goal isn’t theater; it’s governance — the quiet, daily work of keeping schools open, hospitals funded, and police accountable to local law, not to a presidential whim.

The Playbook: How Soft Secession Works

1. Refuse Commandeering: State agencies aren’t repurposed as federal enforcement arms. Local police stay local. Prosecutorial priorities remain in-state.

2. Sue Early, Sue Often: Temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, and multistate briefs that narrow or block federal overreach before it lands on your street.

3. Build Shield Laws: Protect doctors, patients, migrants, voters, and journalists from out-of-state fishing expeditions. Harmonize protections across states so residents aren’t defenseless when they travel.

4. Control the Purse: Create budget backstops for any federal retaliation. Use procurement power (trillions in state/local purchasing) to set standards and deny contracts that undermine rights.

5. Use the Guard Lawfully: Keep National Guard units under state control for public safety, and be explicit about when (and whether) federalization is appropriate.

6. Data & Privacy Walls: Limit sharing of sensitive state data (health, education, location) with agencies attempting mass surveillance or political targeting.

7. Communications Discipline: Governors and AGs move in lockstep — legal filings, agency guidance, and messaging arrive together to signal certainty to courts, residents, and frontline workers.

The People Running Point

• Attorneys General to watch: Rob Bonta (CA), Dana Nessel (MI), Letitia James (NY), Keith Ellison (MN), Phil Weiser (CO), Matt Platkin (NJ), Kris Mayes (AZ), Anthony Brown (MD) — a cross-section of the coalition that treats constitutional litigation like public-safety infrastructure.

• Legislative partners in key states draft rapid-response bills that match the legal strategy: protect budgets, define policing limits, and codify privacy.

Guardrails (Straight Talk)

• States can’t stop federal officers from doing federal work, and Congress can condition certain funds. That’s the chessboard.

• The answer isn’t performative defiance; it’s precision — write clean laws, pick smart cases, and maintain public legitimacy. Federal judges notice the difference between stunts and governance.

What to Watch Next

• Any “comprehensive crime” push that smuggles in nationalized policing.

• Attempts to yank grants unless states enforce federal priorities.

• Litigation over emergency powers and domestic deployments.

• New interstate compacts that harden data privacy, reproductive care, and voting protections.

• Whether red-blue cooperation emerges on areas like fentanyl, trafficking, and AI safety — proof that soft secession isn’t a culture war, it’s constitutional hygiene.

Why This Matters

Authoritarians centralize power because chaos is their oxygen. Democrats, independents, and democracy-first conservatives can disagree on policy and still agree on structure: local control, lawful limits, and accountable policing. “Soft secession” preserves the map — and the republic — by refusing to let any one leader write over fifty state constitutions.

If you value receipts over rumors and freedom over fear, share this piece, support your local newsroom, and subscribe. Democracy is a team sport.